THE GAP BETWEEN EXPECTED AND ACTUAL SERVICE QUALITY OF ORGANIZED RETAIL STORES IN HYDERABAD

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Total

 

Number of Respondents

 

When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so (A)

4

4

26

40

26

100

This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records (B)

2

8

20

44

26

100

Total

6

12

46

84

52

200

Source: Primary data

 

Figure 6: Expected Reliability

 

 

 

 

Table 7: Actual Reliability

Parameters

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Total

 

Number of Respondents

 

 

When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so (A)

10

18

34

32

6

100

This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records (B)

2

10

42

36

10

100

Total

12

28

76

68

16

200

Source: Primary data

Figure 7: Actual Reliability

 

 

 

 

Table 8: Reliability

Parameters

Expected service (E) (weighted average)

Actual Service (A)  (weighted average)

Difference (E-A)

(weighted average)

When this store promises to do something by a certain time, it will do so (A)

 

3.80

 

3.06

0.74

This store insists on error-free sales transactions and records (B)

3.84

3.42

0.42

Source: Primary data

 

Figure 8: Reliability

 

Null Hypothesis

There is no significant difference between actual and expected reliability by customers.

 

By applying Chi-square test, the table value for 1 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance is 3.841. The calculated value of ?2 0.663 is much lower than the table value. Hence, the result of the experiment supports the hypothesis. We can thus conclude that, “There is no significant difference between actual and expected reliability”.

 

Personal Interaction

From Table 11 it is clear that the customers feel that employees are consistently courteous with customers. 26 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that the employees in the stores give prompt service to customers. Similarly, 26 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that the employees in the stores are consistently courteous with customers. 28 percent of the respondents strongly agreed that employees in the stores are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests.

 

Table 9: Expected Personal Interaction

Parameters

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Total

 

Number of Respondents

 

Employees in this store give prompt service to customers (A)

4

4

24

42

26

100

Employees in this store are consistently courteous with customers (B)

2

12

22

38

26

100

Employees in this store are never too busy to respond to customer’s requests (C)

0

12

20

40

28

100

Total

6

28

66

120

80

300

Source: Primary data

Figure 9: Expected Personal Interaction

 

Table 10: Actual Personal Interaction

Parameters

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly

Agree

Total

 

Number of Respondents

 

Employees in this store give prompt service to customers (A)

2

16

20

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9