Why do Christians not commend L. Ron Hubbard for verifying KEY Biblical Doctrines?

Question by Black Christian Scientologist: Why do Christians not commend L. Ron Hubbard for verifying KEY Biblical Doctrines?
I would have liked to simply leave the question as it is, and let the Answerers affirm the truth of what I have said.
(I have to enter all this on my phone, because there is NO MAINS ELECTRICITY ANYWHERE IN TOWN OR ON CAMPUS. This is part of life in Africa. The public officials loot the treasuries, and divide the spoils among themselves, instead of developing the infrastructure. Scientology has stopped situations like this before (ABOUT RHODESIA- by LRH), something people and gangs like “ANONYMOUS” don’t talk about, because they don’t want you to know.)

The first sign someone wants to deceive you as to the nature of Scientology- or show you how well such deception worked on them- they say: “L. Ron Hubbard was a Sci-Fi writer, who decided to start a religion.”

Lots of people don’t think much of writers, in general, but Sci-Fi writers are least esteemed by them.
How many Sci-Fi novels could you write? Or any sort of novel or short story that would see print?

L. Ron Hubbard had books and stories published under as many as TWENTY pen names, IN EVERY GENRE of literature (LEGACY magazine).
Another fact we don’t hear about. The importance of this is that HE PROVED that he KNEW about ALL life’s problems. When he said he had a Universal Solution to ALL Human Problems, he had at least THE BACKGROUND to know what he was talking about. Have his critics? Have THEY a solution to the problems only Scientology solves- or do they just want to stop those problems being solved?

The other olde Jedi mind-trick is to tell people that: “L. Ron Hubbard founded Scientology, because he told Robert Heinlein that the best way to make a million bucks is to start your own religion!”

This accusation plays on

1. The disbelief in the existence of any Supreme Being, so that what John the Baptist said (John 3:27) COULDN’T be true, and ALL religious leaders are LIARS or DELUSIONAL.
2. So that they receive money for false and nonexistent or worthless services- for which they are ENVIED.
3. People like to feel superior to people who fell prey to a “con” they didn’t. They cannot therefore examine the facts to find THEY were the conned.
4. L. Ron Hubbard got a million dollars out of Scientology because he rendered services WORTH a million dollars. If anyone didn’t think so, they could go buy elsewhere! But there was no one equal or better.
5. The mind that is so… well, what do you call it, when someone BELIEVES that ALL the 250 axioms of Dianetics & Scientology are so TOTALLY INVALIDATED that they don’t have to even LOOK and see for themselves, whether they are invalid or not, because someone TOLD THEM A STORY about L. Ron Hubbard- which they cannot even verify?

Even if the STORIES are true- what are their relevance? WHY are people telling you them?

Third Objection: The Church of Scientology commits immoral and criminal acts against its members!

That is totally their own business! What fool pays $ 300 a year to have their Human Rights revoked? Did they forget where the door was?
Whatever “abuse” you think they suffered, they underwent to QUALIFY to inflict the SAME abuse on others.
Why do that when the goal is to attain the state of CLEAR?
They brought it on themselves in the attempt to bring it on others. Why sympathize?

Fourth Objection: The Church of Scientology commits criminal acts against non-members!

“Ah- you refer to the Prophecy of “HE-THAT-WILL-BRING-FAIR-GAME-TO-THE-EARTH,” you believe its this… guy?”

The “Fair-Game” Policy is the only authentic UTTER STUPIDITY in Scientology.

For those who don’t know, it says, in effect, “ANY WICKED THING DONE IN VENGEANCE AGAINST ENEMIES OF SCIENTOLOGY IS JUSTIFIED.”

THIS I believe L. Ron Hubbard said, because it is in one of his books (INTRODUCTION TO SCIENTOLOGY ETHICS). It is the ONLY foolish teaching in Scientology, and justifies not merely the closure of Churches of Scientology, but the summary execution of any professed member. In Europe and America you have governments and judiciaries that believe in Human Rights. I cannot believe L. Ron Hubbard could teach such a thing, and expect his followers to SURVIVE in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, or the Soviet Union. In the Sharia states of my country, if Muslims think there’re too many Christians (enough to vote in representation,) they burn the churches.

This said, IF YOU HAVE EVIDENCE a Scientologist committed a criminal (“fair game”) act, CHARGE THEM TO COURT! If your evidence doesn’t stand up in court, ITS NOT EVIDENCE! So, it should not be used in slander.

If I were a Scientologist, and it was suggerted or ordered that I commit a “Fair-Game” criminal act or immoral prank, I would let it be known that this was not what I signed up for, nor was it what I paid my fees for, then I would leave. If perchance the door were

Best answer:

Answer by AK winz
i didn’t read any of this but why would some nut job sci fi writer turned religion creator be used in any discussion involving the bible except for slander i mean christianity is crazy enough for the most of us scientology is just plain ridiculous

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!